Sanctions

"You arrogant ass. You've killed us!"
--Andrei Bonovia (The Hunt for Red October)

Over the past couple of weeks, Western governments have levied countless sanctions on Russia. In this context, sanctions are trade restrictions against a foreign country meant to punish that state for behavior deemed undesirable or bad. Russia's invasion of Ukraine sparked a deluge of sanctions ranging from curtailing or banning trade of particular commodities to freezing Russian bank accounts.

Sanctions aim at achieving various political objectives. One is to make the sanctioned country's population hurt to the point where it demands that its ruling regime cease enacting policies that outsiders find objectionable. Another objective is to weaken a country economically and financially so that it depletes resources for conducting belligerent activities. A third objective might be to weaken a state to the point where it can be overthrown by direct attack.

Despite their popularity, sanctions have marginal track records of success. One reason for this is that sanctions require solidarity among outside states in order to be effective. If only a few countries honor the restrictions, then the targeted state can reconfigure its supply chains toward other countries open to trade. The economic strain of sanctions can therefore be mitigated by developing alternative trade channels.

Sanctions also fail because they commonly strengthen resolve in sanctioned states. When freedom to trade with outsiders is forcibly restrained, then nationalistic tendencies increase among a country's population. Rather than creating animosity toward a domestic regime, sanctions often unify nations behind that regime.

It also seems lost on politicians that the economic penalties imposed by sanctions work both ways. When trade is restricted, the productivity benefits of specialization decline as countries diversify to become more self-sufficient. Less output is produced, and standard of living falls--not just for the sanctioned target, but for all countries--even for those who decline to honor the sanctions. In this manner, sanctions behave like tariffs. 

Who is hurt the worst? The world's poor. Because those at the bottom of the economic pyramid have the most to gain from specialization and trade, they become 'collateral damage' when prosperous countries impose trade sanctions. 

Consequently, sanctions themselves may be seen as acts of war. Although they are often levied in response to violence, sanctions are also violent in nature. They forcibly restrict trade--often in manners aimed at hurting others--particularly civilians. In this sense, trade sanctions bear similarity to wartime policies such as the Allied bombing of German and Japanese cities during WWII. 

While sanctions seem to satisfy popular urges to 'do something,' they possess capacity to do more damage than the bad behavior that those restrictions purportedly aim to punish.