Chain of Mischief

Lt Col Matt Brennan: How do you want it, Willis? The easy way, or the hard way?
Leland Willis: I don't want any more tests. Understand, Brennan? No more tests!
Lt Col Matt Brennan: Ok, Willis...the hard way.
--Chain Lightning

If I was an investigative reporter, then I would be sniffing around for the prospects of collusion (corruption might be a better word) between federal, state, and local disease control agencies/health departments w.r.t. CV19 measurement (cases, deaths, etc). Sure feels like there is concerted effort to make the data appears as 'bad' as possible.

Seriously hearing this all over the place. https://t.co/H1RPcgYpbw

— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) July 14, 2020

First step would be understanding who all participating agencies are and how they are connected. Once that hierarchy is established, next step would be determining how they interact with the clinics, hospitals, coroners offices, et al that collect CV19 related data.

33 Florida labs were just busted cooking the books.. reporting 98% positivity rather than 9.8!!!

— Jessi Melton for US Congress (@votejessi2020) July 14, 2020

Florida hospital admits its COVID positivity rate is 10x lower than first reported; Positivity rates have been skyrocketing at various Florida labs, raising concerns of misreporting https://t.co/KVt8TwR4Q3

— Tammy Bruce (@HeyTammyBruce) July 14, 2020

What guidelines standards do the agencies put forth? What data do the agencies collect? How might the raw data be, um, adjusted by the agencies?

So the question is: Nationwide, how many false positives are categorized as “COVID recovered?” And how does one have this amended on ones medical record, since it might be used to discrimate against a person in the future. (eg. admission into the military)

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) July 14, 2020

In short, what does the supply chain for CV19 information look like from end to end?

And how might agents in the chain engaged in mischief?