Cutting Thru the Fudge

Driving home this evening
I could've sworn we had it all worked out
You had this boy believing
Way beyond a shadow of a doubt
--Bryan Adams

Following up on our recent post on CV19 data manipulation (corruption), make sure you understand the extent to which public health officials are inflating the data. In mid June rules were relaxed on what 'counts' as a CV19 positive case. States were suddenly permitted to count up to 16 people who were found to be in contact with a positive case--with no confirmatory test required.

June 10th, each Covid PCR detect, allowed a state to declare up to 16 additional 'suspected' Covid cases under associated exposure, no testing needed.

They said fatalities would rise 28 days later. And by golly they did, right on the day. I suspect these are old backlog cases.

— Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) July 11, 2020

Four weeks later, we see a spike in CV19 attributed deaths.

Well sure enough, they started harvesting this untapped reserve of old CDC excess fatalities and lockdown fatalities while I was gone.

And, right on cue... 28 days on the nose... we get our long awaited fatality rise. Viruses, are both punctual & observant of national borders. pic.twitter.com/DUBmfFurZY

— Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) July 11, 2020

Get it?

Meanwhile, a dedicated analyst slogged through the data and filed recent so-called 'backdated deaths' in the weeks that they actually occurred:

Covid19 Deaths By—Wait For It—End of Week They Actually Occurred, What A Novel Concept, 5/2 to 7/11/20. Raw Data Painstakingly Deconstructed & Properly Ordered By @kylelamb8 https://t.co/0FKMeXb5NV pic.twitter.com/l9ZyGBVTih

— Andrew Bostom (@andrewbostom) July 11, 2020

Where did that spike in deaths go?