You better make your face up
In your favorite disguise
With your button down lips
And your roller blind eyes
--Pink Floyd
Wild week on Wall Street was one for the record books as markets became infected with coronavirus fear. One of the largest single week declines in history:
Ten year T-note yield closed at all time lows as investors seek refuge from contagion:
With the virus and associated headlines unlikely to subside any time soon, next week's action should be interesting to say the least.
Saturday, February 29, 2020
Infected Markets
Labels:
bonds,
Depression,
risk,
sentiment,
technical analysis,
time horizon,
yields
Friday, February 28, 2020
Whippy Trippy
"We went like this. He went like that. I said to Hollywood, 'Where'd he go?' And Hollywood said, 'Where'd WHO go?'"
--LTJG Henry 'Wolfman' Ruth (Top Gun)
Whippy trippy am that saw the Dow down another 1000+ at one point on chunky volume and big up/down moves by the minute. The bulls have tried to lift them higher with the COMP in the green at one point.
It 'feels' like we might need another whoosh lower to make way for a tradeable bottom. On the other hand, oversold extremes are registering on multiple gauges.
As such, anything seems possible here.
--LTJG Henry 'Wolfman' Ruth (Top Gun)
Whippy trippy am that saw the Dow down another 1000+ at one point on chunky volume and big up/down moves by the minute. The bulls have tried to lift them higher with the COMP in the green at one point.
It 'feels' like we might need another whoosh lower to make way for a tradeable bottom. On the other hand, oversold extremes are registering on multiple gauges.
As such, anything seems possible here.
Thursday, February 27, 2020
Never Before
Never say never
At heaven's elevator door
--Vanity
Never before have the Dow (-1191), SPX (-138), or COMP (-414) lost as many points on a nominal basis as they did today. Never before has the 10 yr T-note yield closed as low as it did today (1.299%).
After the pounding we've seen so far this week, a significant oversold bounce wouldn't surprise.
At heaven's elevator door
--Vanity
Never before have the Dow (-1191), SPX (-138), or COMP (-414) lost as many points on a nominal basis as they did today. Never before has the 10 yr T-note yield closed as low as it did today (1.299%).
After the pounding we've seen so far this week, a significant oversold bounce wouldn't surprise.
Correction Analog
"1929. As the dizzy decade nears its end, the country is stock market crazy. The great and the humble...the rich man and the working man...the housewife and the shop girl. All take their daily flier in the market, and no one seems to lose. Then like a bombshell comes that never-to-be-forgotten Black Tuesday, October 29. Confusion spreads throughout the canyons of New York's financial district. And men stare wild-eyed at the spectacle of complete ruin. More than sixteen and a half million shares change hands in a single day of frenzied selling. The paper fortunes built up over the last few years crumble into nothing before this disaster which is to touch every man, woman, and child in America."
--Narrator (The Roaring Twenties)
In summer of 1929, the Dow reached the apex of the Roaring Twenties stock market move with another all time high, running up nearly 80% from Jan 1928. It then quickly fell 10%--and then a lot more during the October crash that marked the event that would usher in the Great Depression.
Since the Dec 2018 lows, the present-day Dow ran over 30% to all time highs a couple of weeks ago. Since then, it has quickly fallen about 10%--which tags this market as the quickest to register a 10% decline since the 1929 analog.
Not apples to apples to be sure, but worth keeping in mind.
--Narrator (The Roaring Twenties)
In summer of 1929, the Dow reached the apex of the Roaring Twenties stock market move with another all time high, running up nearly 80% from Jan 1928. It then quickly fell 10%--and then a lot more during the October crash that marked the event that would usher in the Great Depression.
Since the Dec 2018 lows, the present-day Dow ran over 30% to all time highs a couple of weeks ago. Since then, it has quickly fallen about 10%--which tags this market as the quickest to register a 10% decline since the 1929 analog.
Not apples to apples to be sure, but worth keeping in mind.
Labels:
Depression,
risk,
sentiment,
technical analysis,
time horizon
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Income Providers
Katherine Garrison Geary: Oh, Ed, what do Alice or I know about newspapers?
Ed Hucheson: It gives you an income.
--Deadline U.S.A.
To the extent that earnings yield translates into dividend yield, chart shows why bids are unlikely to be completely lost under dividend-paying stocks in today's market environment. In fact, would think chart of SPX dividend yield vs bond yield would show a similar pattern.
If you're looking for investment income, and you're not particularly sensitive to changes in principal/account value, then dividend-paying stocks seem a good deal relative to fixed income. Stocks are generally far more capable of providing income in today's world.
Key is finding dividend payers where yield is likely to be stable/growing even in difficult environments.
Ed Hucheson: It gives you an income.
--Deadline U.S.A.
To the extent that earnings yield translates into dividend yield, chart shows why bids are unlikely to be completely lost under dividend-paying stocks in today's market environment. In fact, would think chart of SPX dividend yield vs bond yield would show a similar pattern.
Spread between S&P 500 earnings yield & BBB corporate bond yield widest since 2014 @SoberLook @bloomberg pic.twitter.com/vZcYaDgQY1— Liz Ann Sonders (@LizAnnSonders) February 26, 2020
If you're looking for investment income, and you're not particularly sensitive to changes in principal/account value, then dividend-paying stocks seem a good deal relative to fixed income. Stocks are generally far more capable of providing income in today's world.
Key is finding dividend payers where yield is likely to be stable/growing even in difficult environments.
Labels:
asset allocation,
bonds,
risk,
technical analysis,
valuation,
yields
Tuesday, February 25, 2020
Ugly Times Ugly
"Right now, it is ugly times ugly."
--Gordon Gekko (Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps)
Two straight ugly days as the Dow lost nearly 900 pts. Breadth was quite negative. For the first time in a long time, every stock on my screen was red on the day.
Technical position of the indexes is interesting. Today's selloff resulted in the Dow breaking its uptrend line off the Dec 2018 lows:
The SPX has fallen to its uptrend line but remains unbroken:
The COMP is still far above its trend line:
Because its last leg higher was driven by lots of momentum plays, the Nasdaq requires more ugly just to catch its uptrend line.
--Gordon Gekko (Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps)
Two straight ugly days as the Dow lost nearly 900 pts. Breadth was quite negative. For the first time in a long time, every stock on my screen was red on the day.
Technical position of the indexes is interesting. Today's selloff resulted in the Dow breaking its uptrend line off the Dec 2018 lows:
The SPX has fallen to its uptrend line but remains unbroken:
The COMP is still far above its trend line:
Because its last leg higher was driven by lots of momentum plays, the Nasdaq requires more ugly just to catch its uptrend line.
Ten Year Record
Drawn into the stream
Of undefined illusion
Those diamond dreams
They can't disguise the truth
--Level 42
Ten year yields marking all time lows this am.
Of undefined illusion
Those diamond dreams
They can't disguise the truth
--Level 42
Ten year yields marking all time lows this am.
'Risk off' trade has full head of steam.The 10-Year US Treasury Yield just hit a new all-time low: 1.33%. $TNX pic.twitter.com/9ucFJkmt49— Charlie Bilello (@charliebilello) February 25, 2020
Is Green Good?
Bill Harding: Going green.
Dusty Davis: Greenage
--Twister
After yesterday's 1000+ pt down day on the Dow, futes are in the green this am. While this takes some pressure off bulls' minds, not sure they are best served by a positive open.
Meanwhile gold is being sold. Will personally be looking favorable spots to add on weakness in the metals complex today.
position in gold
Dusty Davis: Greenage
--Twister
After yesterday's 1000+ pt down day on the Dow, futes are in the green this am. While this takes some pressure off bulls' minds, not sure they are best served by a positive open.
Meanwhile gold is being sold. Will personally be looking favorable spots to add on weakness in the metals complex today.
position in gold
Monday, February 24, 2020
Record Low Yields
She's got a heart of gold
She'd never let me down
But you're the one who always turns me on
You keep me comin' 'round
--Bryan Adams
We're flirting with all time 10 yr yield lows.
The record closing low was 1.37% marked back in July 2016. Currently trading slightly above 1.38%.
no positions
She'd never let me down
But you're the one who always turns me on
You keep me comin' 'round
--Bryan Adams
We're flirting with all time 10 yr yield lows.
The record closing low was 1.37% marked back in July 2016. Currently trading slightly above 1.38%.
no positions
Going Viral
"I gave it a cold. I gave it a virus. A computer virus."
--David Levinson (Independence Day)
Coronavirus contagion outside of China has world markets in sell mode. Europe off ~3%. Although futes have bounced a bit, Dow still indicated down ~800 and SPX off ~90.
Gold up $30 to about $1680.
position in gold
--David Levinson (Independence Day)
Coronavirus contagion outside of China has world markets in sell mode. Europe off ~3%. Although futes have bounced a bit, Dow still indicated down ~800 and SPX off ~90.
Gold up $30 to about $1680.
position in gold
Sunday, February 23, 2020
Monetization and Prices
I never meant to be so bad to you
One thing I said that I would never do
--Asia
Suppose the Fed, thru its debt monetization activities, creates $1 million out of thin air to buy some bonds from one of its primary dealers, JP Morgan (JPM). The Fed lifts $1 million worth of Treasuries, agencies, et al from JPM's inventory in exchange for the newly minted cash.
Being a financial institution, JPM is likely to put the money to work thru lending or investing activities. Let's say that JPM uses the $1 million for proprietary trading in stocks. It might even lever up its trading capital to get extra bang for the buck.
Regardless of how it is used, the bulk of the $1 million remains in the financial system somewhere. Unlike credit money that exists only as long as the borrower has appetite for leverage, money created for monetization purposes persists unless/until the Fed reverses its initial transaction and sells its bonds on the market--at which time the Fed reclaims and retires the $1 million that it had previously printed.
As expected, the $1 million that JPM deploys causes prices to rise while it is in the market. But because JPM and other financial institutions are the early beneficiaries of the newly minted cash, it is primarily the prices of financial assets that rise. Stocks, bonds, real estate...whatever the banks buy with the $1 million go up in price. Importantly, as long as financial assets go higher in price, most of the $1 million dollars of newly created money remains locked in the financial system.
This is why we do not see broad consumer price increases from central bank monetization activities--at least initially. Financial assets prices can shoot toward the moon (as we have seen) while the prices of break and milk remain relatively stable.
If for some reason prices of financial assets begin to fall, then the balance might shift. Lower prices will drive investors to sell and pull money out of the financial system. When this occurs, the $1 million is released from the financial system begins to make its way into the every day economy.
This is when we'll see the price of goods and services rise in earnest.
The formal propositions are as follows:
Proposition 1a: When money is created for central bank monetization activities, the printed money will be used by financial institutions to buy financial assets, thus driving asset prices higher.
Proposition 1b: When prices of financial assets subsequently decline, the printed money rotate out of the financial system into the everyday economy, where it will be used by consumers to buy goods and services, thus driving consumer prices higher
no position
One thing I said that I would never do
--Asia
Suppose the Fed, thru its debt monetization activities, creates $1 million out of thin air to buy some bonds from one of its primary dealers, JP Morgan (JPM). The Fed lifts $1 million worth of Treasuries, agencies, et al from JPM's inventory in exchange for the newly minted cash.
Being a financial institution, JPM is likely to put the money to work thru lending or investing activities. Let's say that JPM uses the $1 million for proprietary trading in stocks. It might even lever up its trading capital to get extra bang for the buck.
Regardless of how it is used, the bulk of the $1 million remains in the financial system somewhere. Unlike credit money that exists only as long as the borrower has appetite for leverage, money created for monetization purposes persists unless/until the Fed reverses its initial transaction and sells its bonds on the market--at which time the Fed reclaims and retires the $1 million that it had previously printed.
As expected, the $1 million that JPM deploys causes prices to rise while it is in the market. But because JPM and other financial institutions are the early beneficiaries of the newly minted cash, it is primarily the prices of financial assets that rise. Stocks, bonds, real estate...whatever the banks buy with the $1 million go up in price. Importantly, as long as financial assets go higher in price, most of the $1 million dollars of newly created money remains locked in the financial system.
This is why we do not see broad consumer price increases from central bank monetization activities--at least initially. Financial assets prices can shoot toward the moon (as we have seen) while the prices of break and milk remain relatively stable.
If for some reason prices of financial assets begin to fall, then the balance might shift. Lower prices will drive investors to sell and pull money out of the financial system. When this occurs, the $1 million is released from the financial system begins to make its way into the every day economy.
This is when we'll see the price of goods and services rise in earnest.
The formal propositions are as follows:
Proposition 1a: When money is created for central bank monetization activities, the printed money will be used by financial institutions to buy financial assets, thus driving asset prices higher.
Proposition 1b: When prices of financial assets subsequently decline, the printed money rotate out of the financial system into the everyday economy, where it will be used by consumers to buy goods and services, thus driving consumer prices higher
no position
Saturday, February 22, 2020
Energy Infamy
Evelyn Johnson: And, if you have a fault, which you obviously don't, it's modesty.
Rafe McCawley: No, if I have a fault, it's candor.
--Pearl Harbor
Last time energy stocks in the SPX were this low relative to the overall index was late 1941.
The beaten down energy sector is facing Pearl Harbor once again. Feels like we're either facing the end of the sector as we know it, or a rare investment opportunity.
Rafe McCawley: No, if I have a fault, it's candor.
--Pearl Harbor
Last time energy stocks in the SPX were this low relative to the overall index was late 1941.
The beaten down energy sector is facing Pearl Harbor once again. Feels like we're either facing the end of the sector as we know it, or a rare investment opportunity.
Friday, February 21, 2020
Narrowing Names
After three days in the desert sun
I was looking at a river bed
And the story it told of a river that flowed
Made me sad to think it was dead
--America
When stock market rallies get long in the tooth, breadth tends to narrow. Traders swap out of names no longer working into the few that still are.
This time around stocks left standing include the familiar FAANG suspects plus names like Microsoft (MSFT) and Tesla (TSLA).
When traders leave these names, there will be no horses left.
no positions
I was looking at a river bed
And the story it told of a river that flowed
Made me sad to think it was dead
--America
When stock market rallies get long in the tooth, breadth tends to narrow. Traders swap out of names no longer working into the few that still are.
Here's a tidbit. Over the past *3* months, fewer than 40% of S&P 500 component stocks have beaten the index.— SentimenTrader (@sentimentrader) February 20, 2020
When the S&P was at a 52-week high at the time, this is the fewest % of outperformers in at least 15 years.
The only other days with < 40% were in October 2007. https://t.co/suswHMQsJA
This time around stocks left standing include the familiar FAANG suspects plus names like Microsoft (MSFT) and Tesla (TSLA).
When traders leave these names, there will be no horses left.
no positions
Disorderly Move
Now did you see the news today
They say the danger's gone away
But I can see the fire's still alight
Burning into the night
--Genesis
The breakout move in gold continues. The yellow metal is up another $29 in early trading.
Remember that gold is a bet on disorder.
position in gold
They say the danger's gone away
But I can see the fire's still alight
Burning into the night
--Genesis
The breakout move in gold continues. The yellow metal is up another $29 in early trading.
Remember that gold is a bet on disorder.
position in gold
Thursday, February 20, 2020
Freedom at the Door
I want to fly like an eagle
Till I'm free
Fly through the revolution
--Steve Miller Band
Hard not to smile at this pic as winter gets long in the tooth, er beak.
When birds of freedom greet you at the door, you know it's going to be a great day.
Till I'm free
Fly through the revolution
--Steve Miller Band
Hard not to smile at this pic as winter gets long in the tooth, er beak.
just an average winter day in Decorah, Iowa pic.twitter.com/tSutwTmNuj— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) February 19, 2020
When birds of freedom greet you at the door, you know it's going to be a great day.
Wednesday, February 19, 2020
Gold Breakout
When situations never change
Tomorrow looks unsure
Don't leave your destiny to chance
What are you waiting for
--Swing Out Sister
Pretty breakout in gold as it moves higher out of a classic cup-and-handle setup. Spot gold now resides above $1600/oz--a level last touched in early 2013.
Perhaps investors are catching on to the gargantuan quantity of monetary stimulus being injected by central banks worldwide.
position in gold
Tomorrow looks unsure
Don't leave your destiny to chance
What are you waiting for
--Swing Out Sister
Pretty breakout in gold as it moves higher out of a classic cup-and-handle setup. Spot gold now resides above $1600/oz--a level last touched in early 2013.
Perhaps investors are catching on to the gargantuan quantity of monetary stimulus being injected by central banks worldwide.
position in gold
Tuesday, February 18, 2020
Lagged Effects and Uncertainty
"Why can't they invent a shot that keeps time from passing?"
--Jory Emhoff (Contagion)
The CoronaVirus situation presents good examples of lagged effects. It takes at least 10 days, perhaps longer, to diagnose someone with the virus. That means that infected individuals can unknowingly spread the illness for days before exposure is quarantined.
Similarly, the economic consequences of the virus are also lagged. Chinese suppliers are situated at the upstream end of many global supply chains. Many of these suppliers have severely curtailed operations in order to prevent local contagion to the virus. Reports are now surfacing that many container ships moving Chinese-produced goods are either a) sailing from ports with loads far below capacity or b) not leaving port at all.
Because it takes at least a month for many upstream shipments from China to make their way to downstream US retailers, the material consequences of these disruptions won't be visible for several weeks here in the states. Meanwhile, the time lags involved add uncertainty that make ultimate outcomes more difficult to forecast.
I wonder whether market discounting mechanisms that have been mucked up with so much easy money will be able to cut thru the fog of uncertainty and accurately foresee the lagged effects in this case.
--Jory Emhoff (Contagion)
The CoronaVirus situation presents good examples of lagged effects. It takes at least 10 days, perhaps longer, to diagnose someone with the virus. That means that infected individuals can unknowingly spread the illness for days before exposure is quarantined.
Similarly, the economic consequences of the virus are also lagged. Chinese suppliers are situated at the upstream end of many global supply chains. Many of these suppliers have severely curtailed operations in order to prevent local contagion to the virus. Reports are now surfacing that many container ships moving Chinese-produced goods are either a) sailing from ports with loads far below capacity or b) not leaving port at all.
Because it takes at least a month for many upstream shipments from China to make their way to downstream US retailers, the material consequences of these disruptions won't be visible for several weeks here in the states. Meanwhile, the time lags involved add uncertainty that make ultimate outcomes more difficult to forecast.
I wonder whether market discounting mechanisms that have been mucked up with so much easy money will be able to cut thru the fog of uncertainty and accurately foresee the lagged effects in this case.
Monday, February 17, 2020
Low Banks
Have to catch an early train
Got to be to work by nine
And if I had an aeroplane
I still couldn't make it on time
--The Bangles
We've noted the low relative valuations of the energy complex against broader markets several times recently (e.g., here, here). Hadn't realized that bank stocks have also been touching long term relative lows vs the major indexes.
Bank stocks are breaking below levels set at the March 2009 bottom.
Got to be to work by nine
And if I had an aeroplane
I still couldn't make it on time
--The Bangles
We've noted the low relative valuations of the energy complex against broader markets several times recently (e.g., here, here). Hadn't realized that bank stocks have also been touching long term relative lows vs the major indexes.
Ratio of Bank stocks to the S&P 500 hitting a new low today, below the March 2009 low. $KBE $SPY pic.twitter.com/03FRT8LHSz— Charlie Bilello (@charliebilello) February 14, 2020
Bank stocks are breaking below levels set at the March 2009 bottom.
Labels:
credit,
Depression,
energy,
sentiment,
technical analysis,
valuation
Sunday, February 16, 2020
Uncertainty and Real Options
Can you see the real me?
Can you? Can you?
--The Who
Investment is the act of incurring immediate cost in expectation of future rewards. Investment decisions generally share three characteristics (Dixit & Pindyck, 1994). First, the investment is irreversible to some degree. Should you change your mind and want to unwind the investment, its initial cost cannot be completely recovered. It is at least partially sunk.
Second, the future rewards associated with the investment are uncertain. Alternative outcomes associated with higher or lower rewards might be identifiable, but the best you can do ex ante is estimate probabilities of those various alternatives to guide your decision.
Finally, latitude exists about when the decision can be made. You can postpone action to get more information in order to reduce--although never completely eliminate--uncertainty about the future.
The possibility of delaying an irreversible investment decision creates an option--i.e., the right, but not the obligation--to buy an asset at some future time. Analogous with options in financial assets, opportunities to acquire real assets under such flexible arrangements are sometimes called 'real options.'
Reference
Dixit, A.K. & Pindyck, R.S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Can you? Can you?
--The Who
Investment is the act of incurring immediate cost in expectation of future rewards. Investment decisions generally share three characteristics (Dixit & Pindyck, 1994). First, the investment is irreversible to some degree. Should you change your mind and want to unwind the investment, its initial cost cannot be completely recovered. It is at least partially sunk.
Second, the future rewards associated with the investment are uncertain. Alternative outcomes associated with higher or lower rewards might be identifiable, but the best you can do ex ante is estimate probabilities of those various alternatives to guide your decision.
Finally, latitude exists about when the decision can be made. You can postpone action to get more information in order to reduce--although never completely eliminate--uncertainty about the future.
The possibility of delaying an irreversible investment decision creates an option--i.e., the right, but not the obligation--to buy an asset at some future time. Analogous with options in financial assets, opportunities to acquire real assets under such flexible arrangements are sometimes called 'real options.'
Reference
Dixit, A.K. & Pindyck, R.S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Labels:
capital,
fund management,
specialization,
theory,
time horizon,
uncertainty
Saturday, February 15, 2020
Steeped in Aggression
All in all
It's just another brick in the wall
--Pink Floyd
Some claim that the current ESG movement, where investment decisions are being made according to the environmental, sustainability, and governance profiles of target corporations, is 'market driven.' After all, fund managers are allocating capital out of their own volition driven by their own ideals.
However, these ideals have not been formed freely. They flow from particular political ideologies. Government has funded programs that promote, for example, global warming and climate change, and public schools been indoctrinating young minds to these notions for years.
Because resources to fund these initiatives have been sourced from taxpayers, the ESG movement can be seen as an outcome stemming from another in a long line of government-sponsored propaganda campaigns. Rather than being peacefully driven, it is a movement steeped in aggression.
It's just another brick in the wall
--Pink Floyd
Some claim that the current ESG movement, where investment decisions are being made according to the environmental, sustainability, and governance profiles of target corporations, is 'market driven.' After all, fund managers are allocating capital out of their own volition driven by their own ideals.
However, these ideals have not been formed freely. They flow from particular political ideologies. Government has funded programs that promote, for example, global warming and climate change, and public schools been indoctrinating young minds to these notions for years.
Because resources to fund these initiatives have been sourced from taxpayers, the ESG movement can be seen as an outcome stemming from another in a long line of government-sponsored propaganda campaigns. Rather than being peacefully driven, it is a movement steeped in aggression.
Labels:
capital,
climate,
fund management,
manipulation,
markets,
media,
socialism,
taxes
Friday, February 14, 2020
Dotcom Deja Vu
"The guy's a computer wiz. Started up a dotcom out of Virginia called Dollar.com. 'Anything you want under a dollar.' And he did great. Lucky bastard cashed out just before the bubble burst."
--Henry Wayne (Exit Wounds)
Tech valuations vs energy and industrials are pushing tech bubble proportions.
Feeling some dotcom deja vu.
--Henry Wayne (Exit Wounds)
Tech valuations vs energy and industrials are pushing tech bubble proportions.
— Liz Ann Sonders (@LizAnnSonders) February 14, 2020
Feeling some dotcom deja vu.
Thursday, February 13, 2020
Grand Old Flag
"If this man should fall, who will lift the flag?"
--Col Robert Gould Shaw (Glory)
Bullish flag pattern forming in Pan American Silver (PAAS). Technical doctrine says flags usually resolve in the direction of the dominant trend.
Pattern could also be seen as tracing the handle on a 'cup-and-handle' pattern.
Either way, action appears strong.
position in PAAS
--Col Robert Gould Shaw (Glory)
Bullish flag pattern forming in Pan American Silver (PAAS). Technical doctrine says flags usually resolve in the direction of the dominant trend.
Pattern could also be seen as tracing the handle on a 'cup-and-handle' pattern.
Either way, action appears strong.
position in PAAS
Wednesday, February 12, 2020
Non-Housing Debt
"If he makes anybody rich, let him make himself rich...so he can pay off his school loans."
--Carl Fox (Wall Street)
Consumers have been taking on more non-housing debt over the past decade. It now comprises about 30% of household debt (mortgage-related debt comprises the remaining majority).
While car loan debt burden has been on the rise, student loans are the primary contributor to the increase. Their share of consumer debt has more than tripled since 2003.
Credit card debt, on the other hand, as declined slightly as a fraction of total consumer debt.
--Carl Fox (Wall Street)
Consumers have been taking on more non-housing debt over the past decade. It now comprises about 30% of household debt (mortgage-related debt comprises the remaining majority).
While car loan debt burden has been on the rise, student loans are the primary contributor to the increase. Their share of consumer debt has more than tripled since 2003.
Credit card debt, on the other hand, as declined slightly as a fraction of total consumer debt.
Tuesday, February 11, 2020
Liquidity Engine
Who's gonna tell you when
It's too late?
Who's gonna tell you things
Aren't so great?
--The Cars
Fed liquidity index courtesy of CrossBorder Capital suggests that domestic liquidity stemming from central bank monetary policy is at series highs.
It's too late?
Who's gonna tell you things
Aren't so great?
--The Cars
Fed liquidity index courtesy of CrossBorder Capital suggests that domestic liquidity stemming from central bank monetary policy is at series highs.
This is the engine powering stock markets higher.12m change in Fed liquidity suggests this might be largest boost in over 50 years @federalreserve @crossbordercap @SoberLook pic.twitter.com/Cve9027yiU— Liz Ann Sonders (@LizAnnSonders) February 11, 2020
Labels:
Fed,
inflation,
intervention,
measurement,
sentiment
Monday, February 10, 2020
Seeing the Bullish Case
"I can see why you believe that you have nothing left here."
--Guinevere (King Arthur)
It should be no revelation that market commentary on these pages tilts toward a bearish slant. And, to be sure, there are plenty of reasons to believe that security prices, particularly stock prices, are due for a fall--perhaps a big one.
However, even if one has a pessimistic outlook on financial and economic conditions, there are some plausible reasons for stocks to levitate higher. I have been pondering two in particular.
One is the income producing character of equities. With interest rates once again approaching the 'zero bound,' dividend paying stocks appear attractive--particularly to retirees and others looking for income supplements or replacements. Despite the run-up in stock prices, a solid portfolio of stalwart companies with safe dividend profiles can be assembled with a yield of 3% or more. For those willing to stomach up and downs in account value in return for steady income well above that provided by most fixed income instruments, this arrangement appeals to a large group of investors. As long as rates remain unusually low, equity prices--particularly those of dividend payers--may remain well bid.
A second reason for stock prices to remain elevated is the prospect of Big Inflation. In other countries where inflation has really picked up, stocks usually move higher--albeit in devalued currency. While they may not be able to keep up quite as well as alternative assets such as gold, equities are likely to outperform cash by a substantial margin in the event that inflation really takes off.
For aging baby boomers and others trying to create investment income while hedging against inflation, stocks look like an attractive asset class at this point in time.
position in gold
--Guinevere (King Arthur)
It should be no revelation that market commentary on these pages tilts toward a bearish slant. And, to be sure, there are plenty of reasons to believe that security prices, particularly stock prices, are due for a fall--perhaps a big one.
However, even if one has a pessimistic outlook on financial and economic conditions, there are some plausible reasons for stocks to levitate higher. I have been pondering two in particular.
One is the income producing character of equities. With interest rates once again approaching the 'zero bound,' dividend paying stocks appear attractive--particularly to retirees and others looking for income supplements or replacements. Despite the run-up in stock prices, a solid portfolio of stalwart companies with safe dividend profiles can be assembled with a yield of 3% or more. For those willing to stomach up and downs in account value in return for steady income well above that provided by most fixed income instruments, this arrangement appeals to a large group of investors. As long as rates remain unusually low, equity prices--particularly those of dividend payers--may remain well bid.
A second reason for stock prices to remain elevated is the prospect of Big Inflation. In other countries where inflation has really picked up, stocks usually move higher--albeit in devalued currency. While they may not be able to keep up quite as well as alternative assets such as gold, equities are likely to outperform cash by a substantial margin in the event that inflation really takes off.
For aging baby boomers and others trying to create investment income while hedging against inflation, stocks look like an attractive asset class at this point in time.
position in gold
Sunday, February 9, 2020
Interest Rate Decline
It's been such a long time
I think I should be going
And time doesn't wait for me
It keeps on rolling
--Boston
Interesting graph of interest rates over many centuries courtesy of Visual Capitalist. Obviously, the trend over the past eight centuries has been down.
Several theories are proposed to explain long term interest rate decline. Productivity growth should influence interest rates. As productivity increases, scarcity declines. More capital should be available to borrow, thereby lowering borrowing costs.
The article takes a different view, however. Focusing on the continued decline in rates over the past 30-40 yrs, the author proposes that lower productivity leads to less business investment and therefore less demand for capital. The opposite should be true. Lower productivity means that capital will be more scarce. Less supply means higher prices, all things equal.
The author also proposes aging demographics and slowing economic growth as driving rates lower recently. Of course, this does little to explain the longer term down trend, as there were many periods over the past few centuries where populations grew dramatically and economies boomed.
It is also noted that bond yields have been falling coincident with declining rates--as if bond yields are supposed to trend independent of interest rates. Let's clear up the confusion. Interest rates constitute a price--the price associated with borrowing money. Bonds are a vehicle for borrowing money. Bond 'yield' coincides with the borrowing price. The real news would be if interest rates and bond yields were not highly correlated.
What the article completely ignores is the work of central banks over the past 100+ years to interfere with the natural rate of interest. Slowdown in productivity growth should have caused rates to level out or perhaps to rise. However, central bank intervention has continued to force rates lower, thereby keeping the eight century downtrend in place.
If central banks lose control of rates, then they will surely rise and jeopardize the long term downtrend.
I think I should be going
And time doesn't wait for me
It keeps on rolling
--Boston
Interesting graph of interest rates over many centuries courtesy of Visual Capitalist. Obviously, the trend over the past eight centuries has been down.
Several theories are proposed to explain long term interest rate decline. Productivity growth should influence interest rates. As productivity increases, scarcity declines. More capital should be available to borrow, thereby lowering borrowing costs.
The article takes a different view, however. Focusing on the continued decline in rates over the past 30-40 yrs, the author proposes that lower productivity leads to less business investment and therefore less demand for capital. The opposite should be true. Lower productivity means that capital will be more scarce. Less supply means higher prices, all things equal.
The author also proposes aging demographics and slowing economic growth as driving rates lower recently. Of course, this does little to explain the longer term down trend, as there were many periods over the past few centuries where populations grew dramatically and economies boomed.
It is also noted that bond yields have been falling coincident with declining rates--as if bond yields are supposed to trend independent of interest rates. Let's clear up the confusion. Interest rates constitute a price--the price associated with borrowing money. Bonds are a vehicle for borrowing money. Bond 'yield' coincides with the borrowing price. The real news would be if interest rates and bond yields were not highly correlated.
What the article completely ignores is the work of central banks over the past 100+ years to interfere with the natural rate of interest. Slowdown in productivity growth should have caused rates to level out or perhaps to rise. However, central bank intervention has continued to force rates lower, thereby keeping the eight century downtrend in place.
If central banks lose control of rates, then they will surely rise and jeopardize the long term downtrend.
Labels:
bonds,
capital,
central banks,
deflation,
inflation,
leverage,
measurement,
productivity,
yields
Saturday, February 8, 2020
Tech Ten Bagger
"One thing I don't understand is high tech."
--Sandy Riggs (In the Line of Fire)
The NASDAQ Composite (COMP) is now a ten bagger off the March 2009 lows.
--Sandy Riggs (In the Line of Fire)
The NASDAQ Composite (COMP) is now a ten bagger off the March 2009 lows.
An eye catching move for individual names, but for an index...The Nasdaq 100 is now a ten-bagger since its low in March 2009. +900% $QQQ pic.twitter.com/rKRGu4gFMU— Charlie Bilello (@charliebilello) February 6, 2020
Friday, February 7, 2020
Implied Volatility and Policy Uncertainty
Okay
Just a little pinprick
There'll be no more aaahhh
But you may feel a little sick
--Pink Floyd
Chart shows relationship between VIX and Baker et al's Policy Uncertainty Index over time.
The VIX is a measure of 'implied volatility' which can be viewed as a proxy for market-related uncertainty.
A widening gap is evident--one that began around 2000.
One possible interpretation: increasingly aggressive monetary policy is making investors comfortably numb to uncertainty happening in the larger world.
Just a little pinprick
There'll be no more aaahhh
But you may feel a little sick
--Pink Floyd
Chart shows relationship between VIX and Baker et al's Policy Uncertainty Index over time.
The VIX is a measure of 'implied volatility' which can be viewed as a proxy for market-related uncertainty.
A widening gap is evident--one that began around 2000.
One possible interpretation: increasingly aggressive monetary policy is making investors comfortably numb to uncertainty happening in the larger world.
Labels:
central banks,
Fed,
intervention,
manipulation,
measurement,
risk,
technical analysis,
uncertainty
Thursday, February 6, 2020
Asset Price Inflation
I'll buy you a diamond ring my friend
If it makes you feel alright
I'll get you anything my friend
If it makes you feel alright
--The Beatles
Building on yesterday's observation, Liz Sonders observes that there has been inflation over the past decade--in asset prices rather than in goods/services prices.
As Cantillon first observed nearly 300 yrs ago, prices tend to increase most in the vicinity of where new money is created.
If it makes you feel alright
I'll get you anything my friend
If it makes you feel alright
--The Beatles
Building on yesterday's observation, Liz Sonders observes that there has been inflation over the past decade--in asset prices rather than in goods/services prices.
Not a lot of real economy inflation over past decade; but plenty of asset inflation pic.twitter.com/GK0t0IdJoa— Liz Ann Sonders (@LizAnnSonders) February 6, 2020
As Cantillon first observed nearly 300 yrs ago, prices tend to increase most in the vicinity of where new money is created.
Wednesday, February 5, 2020
Inflation Expectations
"Maybe now would be a good time to go over what you expect of me."
--Alice Baxter (Working Girl)
Liz Sonders Fed 'easy money' policies have jacked markets but haven't raised inflation expectations. But why should money created primarily for use inside the financial system influence public expectations for higher prices of goods and services?
Obviously, the Fed's accommodative policies have elevated expectations of higher prices of stocks, bonds, et al among financial professionals. After all, they are the first users of the newly minted cash.
Want to elevate expectations of higher prices among the general public? Then start dropping money from helicopters. As it lands in the streets, watch inflation expectations--and general prices--take off.
--Alice Baxter (Working Girl)
Liz Sonders Fed 'easy money' policies have jacked markets but haven't raised inflation expectations. But why should money created primarily for use inside the financial system influence public expectations for higher prices of goods and services?
Fed’s 2019 rate cuts & liquidity injections helped lift stock prices, but haven’t done same for inflation expectations pic.twitter.com/myJX6lnf8J— Liz Ann Sonders (@LizAnnSonders) February 5, 2020
Obviously, the Fed's accommodative policies have elevated expectations of higher prices of stocks, bonds, et al among financial professionals. After all, they are the first users of the newly minted cash.
Want to elevate expectations of higher prices among the general public? Then start dropping money from helicopters. As it lands in the streets, watch inflation expectations--and general prices--take off.
Tuesday, February 4, 2020
Tesla Mania
She's so high
High above me
She's so lovely
--Tal Bachman
Markets are currently obsessed with everything ESG (environmental-sustainability-governance). Fund managers proclaim that they will only own shares of companies with positive ESG profiles. That means buying everything green and selling everything black (as in crude).
Nothing exemplifies this mania more than Tesla (TSLA). The stock has quadrupled in the last 8 months and now sports a market cap (~$140B) greater than any car company save for Toyota--despite its tiny production levels.
The parabolic frolic is unmistakable and reminiscent of bubbles past. The stock, btw, is indicated another $100 higher pre-market this am.
no positions
High above me
She's so lovely
--Tal Bachman
Markets are currently obsessed with everything ESG (environmental-sustainability-governance). Fund managers proclaim that they will only own shares of companies with positive ESG profiles. That means buying everything green and selling everything black (as in crude).
Nothing exemplifies this mania more than Tesla (TSLA). The stock has quadrupled in the last 8 months and now sports a market cap (~$140B) greater than any car company save for Toyota--despite its tiny production levels.
The parabolic frolic is unmistakable and reminiscent of bubbles past. The stock, btw, is indicated another $100 higher pre-market this am.
no positions
Labels:
climate,
productivity,
sentiment,
technical analysis,
valuation
Monday, February 3, 2020
Place To Be
When situations never change
Tomorrow looks unsure
Don't leave your destiny to change
What are you waiting for?
--Swing Out Sister
Graph below shows that US equity markets have been the place to be over the past decade.
What will the coming decade bring?
Tomorrow looks unsure
Don't leave your destiny to change
What are you waiting for?
--Swing Out Sister
Graph below shows that US equity markets have been the place to be over the past decade.
What will the coming decade bring?
Labels:
China,
EU,
intervention,
Japan,
markets,
socialism,
technical analysis
Sunday, February 2, 2020
Four Trillion$
I keep a close watch on this heart of mine
I keep my eyes wide open all of the time
I keep the ends out for the tie that binds
Because you're mine, I walk the line
--Johnny Cash
With Amazon's (AMZN) pop on positive earning last week, we briefly added a fourth stock to those sporting market caps of at least $1 trillion. The melt on Friday took both AMZN and GOOG back below the line.
Here's the current standings:
AAPL $1.35T
MSFT $1.29T
AMZN $996B
GOOG $988B
Who's next in line, you ask? Facebook (FB) currently ranks #5, but at a mkt cap of $576 billion it's gonna need a big rally to cross the line.
no positions
I keep my eyes wide open all of the time
I keep the ends out for the tie that binds
Because you're mine, I walk the line
--Johnny Cash
With Amazon's (AMZN) pop on positive earning last week, we briefly added a fourth stock to those sporting market caps of at least $1 trillion. The melt on Friday took both AMZN and GOOG back below the line.
For the first time ever, there are 4 trillion-dollar companies in the US: Apple, Microsoft, Google, and Amazon.$AAPL $MSFT $GOOGL $AMZN pic.twitter.com/e7FPXJVvFN— Charlie Bilello (@charliebilello) January 30, 2020
Here's the current standings:
AAPL $1.35T
MSFT $1.29T
AMZN $996B
GOOG $988B
Who's next in line, you ask? Facebook (FB) currently ranks #5, but at a mkt cap of $576 billion it's gonna need a big rally to cross the line.
no positions
Saturday, February 1, 2020
Brexit Now
London calling to the imitation zone
Forget it brother
You can go it alone
--The Clash
I second Rand Paul's best wishes to the UK as Brexit is done.
Countries walking away from treaties does not imply some sort of xenophobic nationalism. It reflects natural impulse for sovereignty and self-determination.
It does not mean isolation. Prosperity is built thru specialization and trade rather than from self-sufficiency. Co-dependence not thru force, but thru voluntary cooperation between sovereign entities.
With Brexit, the UK is choosing freedom over force by being open for business.
Forget it brother
You can go it alone
--The Clash
I second Rand Paul's best wishes to the UK as Brexit is done.
I wish the United Kingdom all the best as it gains back sovereignty, independence and liberty! I very much look forward to working with you to strengthen our ties for the benefit of all our people! 🇺🇸 🇬🇧 @Nigel_Farage @BorisJohnson @DominicRaab https://t.co/NKOrho4dbR— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) February 1, 2020
Countries walking away from treaties does not imply some sort of xenophobic nationalism. It reflects natural impulse for sovereignty and self-determination.
It does not mean isolation. Prosperity is built thru specialization and trade rather than from self-sufficiency. Co-dependence not thru force, but thru voluntary cooperation between sovereign entities.
With Brexit, the UK is choosing freedom over force by being open for business.
Cyclical or Secular?
Then one day he was shooting' at some food
And up through the ground come a bubblin' crude
Oil that is
Black gold, Texas tea
--Flatt and Scruggs
Chart shows that, over the past 8 yrs, Exxon Mobil (XOM) stock has lost money while the SPX is up nearly 2x. I doubt whether this chart truly indicates 'total return' basis, however. My charting program suggests XOM's share price down ~6% but the stock's hefty dividend closes the gap somewhat.
That said, XOM's (and the entire energy sector's) under performance is undeniable. The question is whether this under performance is cyclical or secular.
I'm betting the former.
position in XOM
And up through the ground come a bubblin' crude
Oil that is
Black gold, Texas tea
--Flatt and Scruggs
Chart shows that, over the past 8 yrs, Exxon Mobil (XOM) stock has lost money while the SPX is up nearly 2x. I doubt whether this chart truly indicates 'total return' basis, however. My charting program suggests XOM's share price down ~6% but the stock's hefty dividend closes the gap somewhat.
That said, XOM's (and the entire energy sector's) under performance is undeniable. The question is whether this under performance is cyclical or secular.
I'm betting the former.
position in XOM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)